Certainly the standard for understanding the comic book as a medium might well be Scott McCloud’s Â Understanding Comics.Â It’s a great book and is about as well-approached a discussion as I’ve seen.
Comics Should be Good! has a cool, image-heavy post on the formats that have shaped the reading experience of comic books “Shapeshifting Saturday“. It’s a great, in-depth look at the evolution of the medium, from the comic book’s original form as cut and pasted newspaper strips to then thinking about the page as its own storytelling unit:
“It took a couple of years for artists to realize that the comics page,Â itself,Â was the design unitâ€¦ and that the elements on an individual pageÂ could be arranged in any way they likedÂ to tell the story they wanted to tell.”
There were even attempts to make comic books more book-like, similar in size to paperback Â books, which never seemed to catch on. Still, that kind of rethinking about page size and format was perhaps the start of moving into the right direction:
The ugly truth is that, from a printing and production view, seven inches by ten inches as a page size has almost nothing to recommend it in any case. Itâ€™s non-standard …Â By all rational measures, itâ€™s a dumb page size. So why do we still use it?”
The logic here is that the comic book page again could and perhaps should Â be re-imagined and recreated for a new kind of reading, the kind of reading which happens on a screen size. If anything, this seems to be an opportunity to experiment even further with the storytelling aspects, instead of being bound by the limits of the printed page.
Comic Book Resources (“Digital Comics & User-Experience“) makes the argument that there are inherent problems with trying to fit an old format (the one of the printed comic book page) to a new one (the digital screen): “No one has taken the comic book and recreated it to live on computers, it has not yet adapted”
This part below got me thinking. Particularly because it seems especially to borrow upon the language of web design (if you replace the words “comic books” with “web pages” you’ll see what I mean:
“Good design is invisible, because it works so well that the content it serves just flows without people being aware of why or how. Right now the act of reading comic books online takes a conscious effort, the reader is always aware of the process of reading. This is a dramatic loss in the experience of losing oneself in the comic book reading and can only be rectified by a new perspective on the design as it applies to the digital space.”
And that’s the thing, isn’t it? Perhaps the point of reference for digital comic book shouldn’t be the printed pages of a book, the same format that’s been used for the past many decades, but instead, a webpage and the design principles that follow from it are a more apt comparison with the new digital comic book page. Perhaps.
In a related way, the reading experience of the comic book isn’t quite as portable as ebooks are, it seems. Again this comes back to the nature of the medium, and the fact that there’s some transition work to be done moving fromÂ 6 â…” x 10 Â¼” printed pages to screens. See Wired, “Comic Books on the iPhone? No Thanks” —
The Wired article in question mentions a couple of comic book reading iPhone apps, neither of which seems very good. Granted the article is dated (way back in 2008!), and newer, better apps have come out since, such as Marvel Comics for iPhone. But the point that is interesting is the nature of the complaint: “But the one-at-a-time viewing of pictures really kills the experience. There is no sense of design or pacing.”